Aura Delegate Thread

[BIP-78] Delegate Aave Holding to Llama

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Llama has been a stalwart for governance in the Aave community and they are very familiar with the ecosystem. The delegation of voting power to Llama is a positive and practical approach.

[BIP-79] Enable COMP/wstETH Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This pool provides an opportunity for large holders of the COMP token to spread their votes out to other pools, and this pool would significantly increase any yield earned over time. This appears to be a better solution as it provides better yield for Balancer.

[BIP-80] Enable bb-rf-asUSD/bb-rf-aUSD Gauge [Optimism]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: These pools have a lot of potential moving forward providing they get picked up easily by DEX aggregators and cowswap.

[BIP-81] Enable wstETH/bb-rf-aUSD/bb-rf-aWBTC 50/25/25 Gauge [Optimism]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: As per BIP 80. Again a great option with yield bearing pools and additional fee revenues for Balancer.

[BIP-82] Enable bb-rf-aWETH/wstETH Gauge [Optimism]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: as above

2 Likes

[BIP-83] Enable DOLA/bb-a-USD Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This 50/50 DOLA/bb-a-USD pool will be good for the ongoing growth of the Balancer ecosystem. Inverse Finance’s debt-backed USD stablecoin, DOLA, is not “algorithmic” and the INV governance token is not used to mint or redeem DOLA. Inverse finance have also indicated a strong desire to become more involved in the ecosystem through incentives as they seek to further deepen their liquidity.

2 Likes

[BIP-84] Revoke Hexagon’s Friendly Fork Status

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Friendly fork status implies quality development and progress in another protocol. To date this has not been achieved and so revoking this status makes sense.

[BIP-85] Redeem TRIBE

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Good to see this is coming to a conclusion.

[BIP-86] Enable bb-rf-aUSDC/bb-rf-aUSDT/bb-rf-aDAI Gauge [Optimism]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: These new gauges appear to be very good for the ecosystem.

[BIP-87] Enable rETH/bb-rf-aUSD/rf-grain-OP 50/25/25 Gauge [Optimism]

Vote Yes

Rationale: As above

[BIP-88] Enable rETH/BEETS/bb-rf-aUSD/bb-rf-grBAL Gauge w/2% emissions cap [Optimism]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: With a smaller token included in this gauge it is good to see that the 2% cap is being included in the proposal from the start. This will help to manage expectations for a healthy ecosystem.

[BIP-89] Enable wstETH/bb-a-usd Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: As per above.

[BIP-90] Enable rETH/bb-a-usd Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Another strong gauge being added to the Balancer ecosystem. As above.

2 Likes

[BIP-91] Temporarily Adjust Optimism Fee Split

Vote : Abstain

Rationale : We don’t see how this would be a net positive for Aura noting we are on ETH only. Should the future indicate a benefit to the Aura ecosystem then we may change our vote.

[BIP-92] Deploy Liquidity Bootstrapping Pools to BNB Chain

Vote : Yes

Rationale : This appears to be a limited commitment to something that will provide benefit to a number of other protocols and provide fees for Balancer.

[BIP-93] Enable BADGER/rETH 50/50 Gauge [Ethereum] w/10% emissions cap

Vote : Yes

Rationale : The badger/rETH 50/50 with 10% cap is a good example of playing by the rules: yield bearing asset, 50/50 split, voluntary 10% cap. Note that we would vote against Aura supporting any more than 2 different cap weights (i.e. 2% and 10%) as it will get too confusing. Given that veBAL is already capped at 10, it is a reasonable precedent for a second tier.

[BIP-94] Enable wstETH/LDO Gauge [Arbitrum]

Vote : Yes

Rationale : This is a good step to widen the ecosystem for valuable pools especially noting the commitments from Lido thus far to Balancer.

[BIP-95] Enable wstETH/LDO Gauge [Optimism]

Vote : Yes

Rationale : As above.

3 Likes

[BIP-96] Enable palStkAAVE/AAVE 80/20 Gauge w/ 2% emissions cap [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes, Let’s do it.

Rationale: Aura has had some excellent and open dialogue with Paladin and we support what they are seeking to build here.

[BIP-97] Enable IB/rETH 50/50 Gauge w/2% emissions cap[Optimism]

Vote: Yes, Let’s do it.

Rationale: As the OP ecosystem continues to grow this pool looks to be beneficial for both Iron Bank and for Balancer.

[BIP-98] Fjord (Formerly Copper) and Balancer Exclusive Partnership

Vote: Abstain

Rationale: Aura Finance does not have a strong opinion on this proposal but does not wish to oppose it.

[BIP-99] Pay DAO Multisig Stipends for H2 ‘22

Vote: Yes, Let’s do it

Rationale: They have been doing an admirable job and are well deserving of their stipends

[BIP-100] Allocate BAL Liquidity to Silo Finance

Vote: Abstain

Rationale: The Aura delegate council has chosen not to vote on this proposal.

[BIP-101] Enable tetuQi/QI Stable Pool Gauge with 2% emissions cap (Polygon)

Vote: Abstain

Rationale: It is worth pausing here to explain the Abstain position Aura has taken on a few proposals. The Aura delegate council has put a considerable amount of time in to discussing the merits of a number of proposals that are not on Ethereum. With Aura being solely deployed on ETH currently it is difficult to see how any of the gauges on other chains will bring value to what Aura is building on Ethereum. To that end, rather than voting no across a series of proposals, Aura will generally choose to abstain from voting on matters that it does not wholeheartedly support but does not wish to actively oppose. This is not a rigid response to all votes on other gauges and the Aura delegate council will continue to consider every proposal on its individual merits. This same logic can be applied to some other Balancer proposals where Aura Finance does not have a core interest.

[BIP-102] Enable the THX/stMATIC Gauge on Polygon with 2% cap

Vote: Abstain

Rationale: as per BIP 101

[BIP-103] Karpatkey Balancer Treasury CU Proposal Update

Vote: Yes, lets do it

Rationale: Putting the Balancer treasury to work does have some risk but this plan appears to do an admirable job of mitigating the risk and promoting the long term health of the Balancer ecosystem.

3 Likes

[BIP-103] Karpatkey Balancer Treasury CU Proposal Update

Vote: YES

Rationale: Aura was supportive of the first iteration of this proposal and continues to be so now with the amendments included.

[BIP-104] Enable the STG/bb-rf-aUSDC Gauge [Optimism]

Vote: YES

Rationale: As a boosted pair this will promote ecosystem health and Stargate is a promising partner.

[BIP-105] Enable STG/bb-a-USD Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: YES

Rationale: As per BIP 104.

[BIP-106] Enable sfrxETH/wstETH/rETH Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: YES.

Rationale: This is an excellent pool for people interested in exposure to Ethereum and Ethereum staking and will provide excellent opportunities for growth for the Balancer ecosystem.

[BIP-107] Retire TEMPLE/DAI & Enable TEMPLE/bb-a-USD 50/50 Gauge w/10% emissions cap [Ethereum]

Vote: YES.

Rationale: The Aura delegates are happy with this outcome. The discussions adhered to our initial thoughts regarding gauge caps as per BIP 93 and the 10% cap for this gauge appears very reasonable. Aura looks forward to more constructive discussions in the future from other voting blocs on how best to promote the health of the ecosystem.

2 Likes

[BIP-108] Enable SD/MaticX 80/20 Gauge with 2% emissions cap (Polygon)

Vote: Yes

Rationale: No concerns and glad to see tis will be the primary liquidity source for Stader on Polygon.

[BIP-109] Whitelist Aragon Gnosis Safe for Balancer’s VotingEscrow

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Great to see Aragon getting involved.

[BIP-110] Enable T/WETH 80/20 Gauge w/2% emissions cap [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: No concerns.

[BIP-111] Index Coop x Balancer DAO Partnership

Vote: Abstain

Rationale: The Aura delegate council debated this proposal and determined that the best course of action was to abstain. Whilst there are potential benefits to Balancer the benefits seem rather small and generally token swaps can be problematic. With that said, the delegate council did not feel strongly enough regarding this proposal to take a firm stance and so has chosen to abstain.

1 Like

Hi Aura delegate council! The Index Coop team appreciates the consideration. Regardless of the outcome, we are excited for future collaboration as we look to incorporate current Aura Boosted BPTs into our upcoming strategies.

5 Likes

[BIP-112] Adjust Balancer Snapshot for Aura AIP-17

Vote: Yes

Rationale: As a result of AIP 17 this vote is largely procedural for us and we are eager to get things moving.

3 Likes

[BIP-140] Introduce TimelockAuthorizer

Vote: YES

Rationale: This proposal is security focused and we support anything security related that improves the health of Balancer and the ecosystem.

[BIP-141] Introduce VeBoost V2

Vote: YES

Rationale: This upgrade will allow for greater functionality and development for other protocols built on top of Balancer. This will be important for our friends at Paladin in the near term.

[BIP-142] Permission Granting - Recovery Mode - ComposableStable-V2

Vote: YES

Rationale: This proposal is security focused and we support anything security related that improves the health of Balancer and the ecosystem.

3 Likes

[BIP-143] Save. Earn. Borrow w/BalancerP2P (includes: licensing fees, increased LP activity, new product, more engagement)

Vote: No

Rationale: Aura Finance has already engaged in extensive discussion regarding this proposal in our own forum where the same proposal has been made.

[BIP-144] Fund Balancer Grants Q1 2023

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The Balancer grants program continues to operate prudently and efficiently and we have been impressed with the work carried out recently from the contributors there.

[BIP-145] Fund the Balancer Maxis for Q1 2023

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This is normal business and we support the funding of the Maxi’s and await the decentralization and dissolution of the governance council proposals.

[BIP-146] Incentivize 8020 BPT Staking (ve8020)

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This is an excellent proposal and is part of the unique value proposition that Balancer DAO provides.

5 Likes

[BIP-147] Enable RBN / USDC 50/50 Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The addition of Ribbon Finance liquidity pools to Balancer is a big achievement and Aura is supportive of this pool.

[BIP-148] Enable DOLA/USDC Stableswap Gauge on Ethereum

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This was a straight forward vote to replace a vulnerable gauge.

[BIP-149] Funding Proposal for Silverlight Labs - REVISED

Vote: No

Rationale: The Aura delegate council did not see this as a wise allocation of resources. Noting discussions regarding runway and Balancer treasury, this did not appear to offer value for money.

[BIP-150] Enable wUSDR-USDC Gauge 2% Cap [Polygon]

Vote: Abstain- did not vote

Rationale: The Aura delegate council was split on this vote but decided to abstain. Although the pool looked interesting it was not something that was deemed to be in the best long term interests of Aura Finance. Community voter interest in this proposal was also very low and was not material to the outcome.

[BIP-151] Kill Vulnerable CSP Pool Gauges

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This was a security focused proposal and the delegate council was in full support. .

[BIP-152] Update Core Pool List

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This proposal is a logical flow on from previous proposals regarding security and was supported by the council.

[BIP-153] Whitelist Risk Labs’ Gnosis Safe for veBAL

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The Aura delegate council considers all efforts to accumulate veBAL and participate in the ecosystem to be a positive step for Balancer and for Aura.

[BIP-154] Enable PAR-jEUR Stable Pool Gauge with a 2% cap (Polygon)

Vote: Yes

Rationale: With a 2 % cap these are very interesting pools. The Delegate council passed this vote with a slim majority as it is on Polygon and does not directly impact Aura Finance and the benefits are unclear at this stage. The 2% cap however, is very appropriate and the council decided to vote in favor with an eye on fee generation and volume moving forward.

[BIP-155] Enable agEUR-jEUR Stable Pool Gauge with a 2% cap (Polygon)

Vote: Yes

Rationale: As above.

[BIP-156] Authorize Migration to GaugeAdder v3

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This was a logical vote in support of the ecosystem, supported by the council.

[BIP-157] Migrate cbETH/wstETH Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This proposal will provide for better fee collection and pool management for Balancer and thus support the ecosystem.

[BIP-158] Migrate wstETH/WETH Gauge [Arbitrum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: as above.

3 Likes

[BIP-159] Activate BAL Emissions for Mainnet EURS:USDC “FX Pool” w/2% emissions cap

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Happy to support Xave Finance with this proposal and a 2% cap.

[BIP-160] Enable SD/USDC (50/50) and SD/WETH (80/20) Gauges with 2% emissions cap (Ethereum)

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Although the Aura Delegate Council is happy to support this proposal, the council does not think that bundling proposals sets a good precedent for future gauge proposals and approvals.

[BIP-161] Close Year 2 Funding Gap

Vote: Proposal B

Rationale: The Aura Delegate Council debated these proposals in significant detail. Of note, The Aura Delegate Council generally believes that:

The sale of Balancer tokens, whilst undesirable, is currently well supported by the market and is prudent to avoid overspend. There is no guarantee of future market performance and potentially worse conditions in the future may place the DAO in more direct financial hardship (current pump not withstanding)

Whereas Option A appeared to be the softer approach, Option B presented a more direct path to decreasing fee allocation to veBAL holders and creating a more assured runway through the sale of Balancer tokens. The long term health of the DAO appeared to be better supported by Option B and Aura Finance looks forward to ongoing updates regarding the state of the treasury and the DAO moving forward.

5 Likes

[BIP-162] Karpatkey Investment Strategy

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The Karpatkey investment strategy is very much in line with the intent as outlined in BIP 103. Bridging assets back to mainnet and allowing for resources to be placed in the new SAFE position is essential in order to allow BIP 103 to be executed effectively.

[BIP-163] Restructure Governance Process - Disband Governance Council

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This proposal generated a lot of discussion on how Balancer proposals might be managed and how best to enable this system without the oversight of the governance council. With that said, this step will take Balancer forward towards a more decentralized model and Aura Finance supports this move.

[BIP-164] Deposit BAL into Aave Polygon v3

Vote: yes

Rationale: Depositing additional BAL into the new Aave v3 pools will generate income for the DAO without diluting voting power. The Aura delegate council supports this move and the desire to generate yield on idle assets.

[BIP-165] Enable ankrETH/ETH Gauge on Ethereum

Vote: yes

Rationale: Aura is very supportive of protocols wishing to deposit their LSD related offerings into the Balancer ecosystem.

3 Likes

[BIP-166] Whitelist the gauge for the StaFi rETH/ETH Pool to receive BAL emissions

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The LSD space continues to grow and Aura Finance supports the addition of these pools. Incentivisation of Liquidity in these types of pools is also likely to provide long term alignment between LSD focused products and the Balancer/Aura ecosystem.

[BIP-167] Fast Track Execution of BIP 159 & 160

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Having an approach that enables certain BIP to be fast tracked provides the necessary flexibility required for the best possible outcomes moving forward.

[BIP-168] Enable DOLA/CUSD Gauge on Ethereum

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This is a stable coin focused gauge and has the potential to generate significant trade volume. This is likely to be a positive for the ecosystem.

[BIP-169] Execute the Transition Migrator

Vote: Yes

Rationale: After some initial discussions regarding the execution of this BIP, Aura Finance is very comfortable with the approach being taken.

4 Likes

BIP-170 Enable PENDLE-ETH (50/50) Gauge with a 2% cap [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Pendle has thus far proven to be an engaged and highly valued part of the Balancer and Aura ecosystem. The Aura delegate council supports this new gauge to deepen their liquidity.

[BIP-171] Enable frxETH/WETH Gauge on Polygon

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This will further deepen the partnership being established with Frax Finance and the broader LSD narrative.

[BIP-172] Enable SPHERE/wMATIC Gauge w/ a 2% Emissions Cap (Polygon)

Vote: Abstain

Rationale: The Aura delegate council do not have a firm view on this proposal on Polygon and have chosen to abstain.

[BIP-173] Enable TRYB / USDC Gauge with a 2% Emission Cap [Ethereum]

Vote: Abstain

Rationale: The Aura delegates do not have a firm view on this proposal regarding a potential stable coin and have chosen to abstain

[BIP-174] Enable wUSDR-USDC Gauge with a 2% Emission Cap [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This gauge has a lot of potential moving forward after showing promise on Polygon.

[BIP-175] Grant permissions for V3 pool factories

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This is necessary for the migration.

[BIP - 176 ] Enable SYN/ETH Gauge

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Another productive partnership and the delegates welcome their addition to the ecosystem.

[BIP-177] Great Migration Wave 1

Vote: Yes

Rationale: A necessary upgrade.

[BIP-178] Enable bb-euler-USD Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Euler is a great protocol and happy to see them get involved with boosted yield.

[BIP-179] Enable wsteth/Tessera Boosted APE Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This has a lot of potential for fee generation for the DAO has a high yield play. It will be very interesting to see how this gauge grows in the ecosystem.

[BIP-180] Enable zUSD/bb-euler-USD Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: abstain

Rationale: zUSD did not appear to be something that could be directly given an uncapped gauge. With a 2% cap, Aura may change its vote in future.

[BIP-181] Enable bb-euler-FRAX/bb-euler-USDC Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The delegates welcome this Frax and Stable coin strategy that will generate interest and fees.

[BIP-182] Enable bb-rf-USD Gauge [Arbitrum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Another useful part of the ecosystem.

2 Likes

[BIP-184] Enable OHM/wstETH Gauge on Ethereum

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Aura has continued to develop the partnership with OHM and this gauge will support that partnership and the LSD narrative.

[BIP-185] Enable bb-i-USD Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This core pool is based on a USDC/USDT and DAI. The risk appears to be low in this proposal and thus is a suitable core pool.

[BIP-186] Enable TUSD-bb-e-USD Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The Aura Finance community has supported the discussions surrounding this proposal and the delegates are happy to support.

[BIP-187] Enable TRYB / USDC Gauge with a 2% Emission Cap [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: With the 2% cap and after some discussions with the community, the delegates are happy to support this gauge. We look forward to welcoming more of the Turkish community.

[BIP-188] Enable MAI-gDAI-USDC on Arbitrum

Vote: NO, this is not the way

Rationale: The delegates have taken note of the concerns raised by community members, especially as expressed by AdamB on Twitter regarding the potential for the protocol to misuse user funds. Additional discussions on the balancer thread also provide further background here. Finally, the delegates are of the view that qiDAO already has a sufficient number of gauges.

[BIP-189] Great Migration wave 2

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Necessary upgrade.

[BIP-190] Transfer Governance Control on Polygon & Arbitrum

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This is a positive step forward for Balancer and the ecosystem across L2s.

[BIP-191] Funding Proposal for Messari Reporting 2023

Vote: Abstain

Rationale: The Aura Delegates are very aware of the excellent product created by Messari and understands the reach and influence that these reports can generate. With that said, the community raised significant concerns about the price of these reports, especially with the currently funding plans and runway targets being discussed in BIP154. To that end, Aura Finance has voted to Abstain

BIP-192: Wire-up authorizer permissions on new linear pool factories

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Necessary upgrade

[BIP-193] Enable bb-yv-USD Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: abstain

Rationale: The Aura delegate council was concerned about the circular nature of the deposit structures as outlined in this proposal along with the additional exposure to other pools within the strategies used by Yearn. For this reason, the delegates chose to abstain.

[BIP-194] Enable bb-g-USD Gauge [Ethereum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: No concerns with this pool

3 Likes

The link above has been amended and the link to forum discussion has also been added. That should provide more context.

2 Likes

[BIP-195] Remove MAI Gauges on Polygon and Arbitrum

Vote: Yes

Rationale: With QiDAO no longer allocating rewards to this pool it makes sense to remove the gauge.

[BIP-196] Redistribution of recovered legacy incentives

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The distribution of these recovered funds is in order and is supported.

[BIP-197] Transfer 250k BAL to Balancer OpCo

Vote: Yes

Rationale: As this is in line with long term treasury support moving forward, and as a result of previous votes, the Delegate Council supports this action.

[BIP-198] Creation of Ecosystem Council and Amended Self-Insurance Fund

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This proposal required some considerable discussion to clarify the request and would have benefited from more time on the Balancer forum to ensure questions have the time to be answered. With that said, this appears to be a prudent move to protect the DAO moving forward.

[BIP-199] Enable PoolRecoveryHelper on v3 Pools

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This is supported by the Delegate Council and is in the long term interests of Balancer DAO.

[BIP-200] Enable veLIT Gauge on Ethereum w/2% emissions cap

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The delegates are happy to support the 2% cap.

[BIP-201] Enable bb-ag-USD Gauge [Gnosis]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The Delegate Council is happy to support these gauges on Gnosis for the Gnosis token, stables and WETH pools.

[BIP-202] Enable bb-ag-GNO/bb-ag-USD Gauge [Gnosis]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The Delegate Council is happy to support these gauges on gnosis for the Gnosis token, stables and WETH pools.

[BIP-203] Enable bb-ag-GNO/bb-ag-WETH Gauge [Gnosis]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The Delegate Council is happy to support these gauges on gnosis for the Gnosis token, stables and WETH pools.

[BIP-204] Enable bb-ag WBTC/WETH/USD Gauge [Gnosis]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The Delegate Council is happy to support these gauges on gnosis for the Gnosis token, stables and WETH pools.

2 Likes

[BIP-205] Enable relayers on gnosis chain and add other missing permissions

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This is a necessary fix to enable Gnosis chain.

[BIP-206] Deploy Balancer to Avalanche

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The deployment to Avalanche opens up a number of possibilities for further expansion of the Balancer ecosystem.

[BIP-207] Grant Balancer Maxis the authorisation to register protocolIds for LinearPools

Vote: Yes

Rationale: As the ecosystem grows it is important to maintain a logical means of tracking and recording that growth. From the proposal: Creating a boosted pool is permissionless. Therefore a process to register protocols is required to allow data-consumers to distinguish which pool belongs to which protocol, even if the pool has been created from the same factory

[BIP-208] Enable Overnight Pulse Gauge [Arbitrum]

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Overnight.fi was very successful on Optimism and the expansion to Arbitrum has a lot of potential.

[BIP-209] Enable ALCX/ETH (80/20) Gauge on Ethereum

Vote: Yes

Rationale: Alchemix has been a long time supporter of balancer and has recently demonstrated further commitment to the Aura ecosystem. The Aura delegates are in support of this pool with a 2% emissions cap.

[BIP-210] Deprecate Old Stargate Gauges & Add Gauges for STG v2

Vote: Yes

Rationale: As this was initially requested by the Stargate group to enable their migration to v2 of their token, the Aura delegates voted in support of this BIP. The decision not to implement BIP 210 as a result of actions from Alameda and recommendations from the Stargsate foundation, was made clear after the vote was executed.

[BIP-211] Kill Euler Boosted Pool Gauges

Vote: Yes

Rationale: The unfortunate events surrounding the exploit of Euler have made this BIP a necessity.

[BIP-212] Deploy Balancer to zkSync

Vote: Yes

Rationale: zkSync is one of many very promising options in the zkEVM space and is currently supported by an array of other protocols. A Balancer deployment here has extensive upside potential with opportunities for Aura to become involved as described in the forum discussion. The Aura delegates are in support of this proposal.

[BIP-213] Whitelist Yearn’s yBAL Voter Contract for veBAL

Vote Abstain

Rationale: While the delegates feel that the creation of another wrapper very similar to the one created by StakeDAO does not bring a whole lot of value to the ecosystem, they do not wish to stand in the way if other stakeholders wish this to be added, and have chosen to abstain for this vote. They note the decision to propose the gauge vote with a 2% cap limits any potential issues during launch.

[BIP-214] Enable Permissions for BatchRelayer v5

Vote: Yes

Rationale: This upgrade will provide for greater efficiency.

[BIP - 215] Messari reporting 2023 (second vote)

Vote: Abstain

Rationale: The Aura delegates appreciated the frank and open discussions with the Messari authors for this BIP. In the end, the delegates felt that the cost to benefit ratio was not in the interests of the DAO and so decided to abstain.

3 Likes