Proposal: [BIP-872] Enable FYNI/waBasUSDC 70/30 Pool Gauge on Balancer v3 (Base) with a 2% Cap
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: We support enabling this gauge. The pool is positioned as the main liquidity venue for the token, and protocol incentives is expected to ensure sufficient depth and trading efficiency.
Proposal: [BIP-873] Balancer Ecosystem Roadmap Proposal and Funding
Vote: 69.12% for Yes, let’s do it, 30.88% for Abstain
Reasoning: This roadmap provides clarity, predictability, and cohesion across service providers. We believe it is essential for aligning Balancer’s efforts over the next year.
Proposal: [BIP-874] Urgent Proposal: Deploy Balancer v3 on Plasma
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Plasma represents a strategic ecosystem, and launching v3 there at inception positions Balancer as a foundational liquidity layer.
Proposal: [BIP-875] Implement EZKL Dynamic Fee Control for Balancer Pools
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Dynamic fees have already shown great results, with tests pointing to 10–30% better fee performance compared to static setups. Excited to see how the 3-month trial goes and if it can scale across more pools.
Proposal: [BIP-876] Enable Gauge for USDp/USDC Stable Pool with a 2% Cap (Base)
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Parallel is a long term supporter of the Balancer ecosystem and the gauge will help boost USDp liquidity.
Proposal: [BIP-877] Kill Stale Gauges Q3 2025
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: We support the removal of gauges that are not being used anymore..
Proposal: [BIP-878] Enable Gauge for USDp/frxUSD Stable Pool with a 2% Cap (Base)
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Parallel is a long term supporter of the Balancer ecosystem and the gauge will help boost USDp liquidity.
Proposal: [BIP-879] Deploy Balancer v3 on X Layer - OKX chain
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Voting For — this is a smart, low-risk move that puts Balancer v3 early in a growing ecosystem alongside Aave. The phased rollout with clear checkpoints keeps things accountable, while the zero treasury cost and audited setup make it a safe way to test traction on X Layer. Good upside, minimal downside.
Proposal: [BIP-880] Enable Gauge for USDp/mevUSDC Stable Pool with a 2% cap (Avalanche)
Vote: Yes, let’s do it
Reasoning: We’re in favor of this proposal. We usually support stablecoin and yield-bearing pools that can strengthen Balancer’s ecosystem and drive sustainable revenue.
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: We support adding this gauge, as interest-bearing assets can increase Balancer’s fees.
,سلام
گیج چیست ؟
بال چیست ؟
ما به کسی که هوش خوبی نداره میگوییم گیج
ما به دستان پرنده که هنگام پرواز باز میکند میگوییم بال
مطمئن هستم تعاریف من با شما متفاوت است
بی نهایت سپاسگذارم
Proposal: [BIP-882] Transitioning Onchain Operations of the Balancer DAO to Balancer Onchain Limited
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: This is the natural next step for moving Balancer’s execution into the proper onchain legal wrapper that was already set up.
Proposal: [BIP-883] Emergency Safe Governance Improvements Q4 2025
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: This makes the emergency layer easier to actually use in real incidents, while removing a permission that we don’t need. Faster response + less risk.
Proposal: [BIP-884] Wire Up BAL Token on Plasma Chain
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Plasma deployment hit the agreed milestones. Straightforward continuation of the rollout.
Proposal: [BIP-885] Permissions Update Request #7
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: Standard permissions update to support new assets + voting delegation.
Proposal: [BIP-886] Enable Gauge for Nerite Surge eeUSDC-yUSND Stable Pool with 2% Cap on Arbitrum
Vote: Yes
Reasoning: The protocol will incentivize the pool and we are supportive of stable depth on Arbitrum.