Thank you, @0xDanko, for your valuable insights. We agree that the proposal should not impose any obligation on BeethovenX, or any other SP, to provide any transition services or retain any Orb or other personnel as part of the transition. From our perspective, we understand that to accomplish a transition from Orb, all transition SPs would have to fully cooperate with OpCo and the Balancer Foundation.
Because we are within 3 months of 7/31 and Orb has not sought to renew its SLA, we assumed it was clear that Orb’s services for the Balancer DAO will not continue beyond 7/31. You also bring up a good point about Orb’s submission of a revised budget. As the Balancer Foundation is a counterparty to Orb’s SLA, it has the standing to ask Orb to provide a revised budget. We believe OpCo can request one, too.