I believe there’s already a consensus being built on the specification, so I don’t see a reason for this conversation to be heated up. We could potentially meet everyone’s expectations, safeguarding our governance process, previous agreements and saving funds all at the same time.
Overriding things with new specifications doesn’t seem fair in this scenario, imo. Governance can vote on it, but then a dissolution between DAO vs. Orb would be one-sided and might be conflictful. At the same time, it wouldn’t be reasonable for Orb to keep all of its staff and current costs for another 2.5 months just to offboard, specially if employees are being absorbed by another SP.
Best-case scenario is Orb coming forward with a viable offboarding plan for them, that is also costly-efficient and expedited enough to favor DAO governance (and as proposed by @immutbl, should be coming on Friday). If we do so and everyone’s happy, we can execute on the needed transactions and transitions, calling it the day.