Hi @bakamoto20,
As previously said, in general, I agree with the idea of giving more flexibility to the committee. I anticipate great interest from various minor projects in the deployment on Balancer. But I feel I have to call for a bit more conservatism on the potential reduction of rewards in the BAL/WETH LP. We are in a transitional phase with a general interest in introducing a staking program, mostly based on the current issue of BAL and the potential of attracting new fresh capital to that specific pool.
I wrote something here about it.
In general terms, therefore, I will support the proposal on the condition that at least for the moment we do not touch the allocation on the BAL/WETH.
All this at least until the final RFC proposal has been defined and a general agreement reached.
What do you think?