For reference, the template:
Summary:
For Mainnet Pools use:
This is a proposal to enable the gauge
0xGaugeAddress
on Ethereum, for the pool0xPoolAddress
(PoolSymbol
).
For pools on any chain except Mainnet.
This is a proposal to enable the root gauge
0xRootGaugeAddress
on Ethereum, [which redirects rewards to the child gauge0xChildGaugeAddress
onChain
,] for the pool0xPoolAddress
(PoolSymbol
).
References/Useful links:
Link to:
• Website
• Documentation
• Github Page
• Communities
• Other useful links?
Protocol Description:
Describe the proposed asset(s), the corresponding protocol(s), and historic prices of the token (price must come from the source of highest liquidity).
Motivation:
Explain why this pool needs incentivization
Specifications:
-
Governance: Provide current information on the protocol’s governance structure. Provide links to any admin and/or multisig addresses, and describe the powers afforded to these addresses. If there are plans to change the governance system in the future, please explain.
-
Oracles: Does the protocol rely on external oracles? If so, provide details about the oracles and their implementation in the protocol.
-
Audits: Provide links to audit reports and any relevant details about security practices.
-
Centralization vectors: Is there any component of the protocol that has centralization vectors? E.g. if only 1 dev manages the project, that is a centralized vector. If price oracles need to be updated by a bot, that is a centralized vector. If liquidations are done by the protocol, that is also a centralization vector.
-
Market History: Has the asset observed severe volatility? In the case of stablecoins, has it depegged? In the case of an unpegged asset, have there been extreme price change events in the past? Provide specific information about the Balancer pool: how long has it been active, TVL, historical volume? You must provide a direct link to the pool AND a link to your pool’s gauge.
-
Value: Is this pool intended to be the primary source of liquidity for the token(s)? If this is not the case, explain the expected value add to Balancer (can this pool generate consistent fees?)
Technical Specification:
Transaction: The Balancer Maxi LM Multisig eth:0xc38c5f97B34E175FFd35407fc91a937300E33860
will interact with the GaugeAdderv4
at 0x5DbAd78818D4c8958EfF2d5b95b28385A22113Cd
and call the addGauge function with the following arguments:
gauge(address): 0xGaugeAddress
0xRootGaugeAddress
gaugeType(string): Network
Note: Please ensure the owner of your pool on Ethereum is set to 0xba1ba1ba1ba1ba1ba1ba1ba1ba1ba1ba1ba1ba1b
If this is not done, please clearly explain why in your proposal.