“we are choosing”? who is we? the community? are you assuming this forum and the vote process is a done deal?
I chose to believe that this is a DAO that fosters debate and will be able to find a better proposal.
@0xMaha asked me in the aura forum (in a post that has not been hidden there yet, as the other were) and you asked me to make it easy for you to address. So, here it is
I am talking about 9 specific questions.
-
my alternate proposal that @0xmaha response in the aura forum admits he failed to get familiar with after 4 days. Your response on the emissions and my proposal quick dismissal suggests perhaps my proposal still need further clarifications and debate before any vote
-
the failure to address the risks of unbudgeted regulatory costs on the runway time given the absurd treasury expenses to payout some while others are neglected.
-
the preferential treatment some vebal holders would get against others. Aura, tetu, stakedao, etc are all vebal holders and MUST be treated equally.
-
the potential fiduciary and due process negligence risks and concerns for the Treasury Council decision makers, as substantive questions on these impacts remain unaddressed. aggravated by the hiding of my posts in that AURA forum.
-
As for your emissions cutting misstep, as I posted on x reproduced here for your convenience https://x.com/sagixapothecary/status/2036940170151268545:
Supply-side shock: cut emissions, production issues, restricted access.
Demand-side shock: create utility, generate volume.
Misdiagnosis kills.
A supply-side fix for a demand-side problem is chemotherapy for a cold
Scarcity amplifies demand, it doesn’t create it.
Restricting something no one wants isn’t strategy.
It’s self-sabotage.
-
I argue that the emissions were planed a long time ago. You have held @belbix to a higher standard when you had him deploy an immutable smart contract for tetubal. Now, after years of unregulated operation on decentralization claims, a small group of a handful of people that controls the DAO, the multisig wallet, the forum and aura are doing just that. Posting a proposal for changing a smart contract ALONG with that programing already done.
-
where in the DAO Treasure balance sheet do the emissions go? I do NOT see that line
-
what is the plan and budget to address the regulatory scrutiny and MiCA / SEC process that WILL arise with the new arising structure? I laid it out and it remains unanswered other than name calling annoying and hallucination.
-
quantify the cost of losing credibility and potential civil exposure for breaching this explicit and misleading marketing campaing on the bal website front in light of the expedited approach of having the code done at the same time of the proposal and the rushed approach. **Note this ad has the reasonable expectation of smart contract ruling.**
happy to discuss specifics on the merits.