# \[Proposal\] Increase BAL Reward Flexibility for LM Committee **URL:** https://forum.balancer.fi/t/proposal-increase-bal-reward-flexibility-for-lm-committee/2024 **Category:** General Proposal **Created:** [July 4, 2021, 1:09am UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/proposal-increase-bal-reward-flexibility-for-lm-committee/2024 "2021-07-04T01:09:51Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 8
### Author: ![Andrea81](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.balancer.fi/andrea81/32/1894_2.png) [@Andrea81](https://forum.balancer.fi/u/Andrea81) #### Post date: [July 13, 2021, 5:46am UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/proposal-increase-bal-reward-flexibility-for-lm-committee/2024/8 "2021-07-13T05:46:59Z")
Hi @bakamoto20, As previously said, in general, I agree with the idea of giving more flexibility to the committee. I anticipate great interest from various minor projects in the deployment on Balancer. But I feel I have to call for a bit more conservatism on the **potential** reduction of rewards in the BAL/WETH LP. We are in a transitional phase with a general interest in introducing a staking program, mostly based on the current issue of BAL and the potential of attracting new fresh capital to that specific pool. I wrote something [here](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/rfc-staking-of-bal-for-economic-and-governance-benefits/2004/15) about it. In general terms, therefore, I will support the proposal on the condition that at least for the moment we do not touch the allocation on the BAL/WETH. All this at least until the final RFC proposal has been defined and a general agreement reached. What do you think? --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/proposal-increase-bal-reward-flexibility-for-lm-committee/2024)._