# Proposal for Symmetric to manage Gnosis Deployment as Friendly Fork of Balancer

**URL:** <https://forum.balancer.fi/t/proposal-for-symmetric-to-manage-gnosis-deployment-as-friendly-fork-of-balancer/3672>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [September 2, 2022, 6:03pm UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/proposal-for-symmetric-to-manage-gnosis-deployment-as-friendly-fork-of-balancer/3672 "2022-09-02T18:03:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fernando](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.balancer.fi/fernando/32/56_2.png) [@Fernando](https://forum.balancer.fi/u/Fernando)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2022, 1:42pm UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/proposal-for-symmetric-to-manage-gnosis-deployment-as-friendly-fork-of-balancer/3672/12 "2022-09-06T13:42:21Z")

</div>

We are also bullish on Gnosis Chain and looking forward to having Balancer on it.

As I mentioned in a [post](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/symmetric-balancer-friendly-fork-proposal/2634/68) in the past, the frontend team (which is leaving BLabs and going to work for Balancer OpCo) has been working a lot on more easily supporting other chains on their UI. This has been especially targeted in the short term for Gnosis Chain and ZkSync.

That said I appreciate the willingness of @wdude and the Symmetric team to keep collaborating in any other ways possible, I hope we can find some good ones!

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/proposal-for-symmetric-to-manage-gnosis-deployment-as-friendly-fork-of-balancer/3672)._
