# Introducing veBAL tokenomics **URL:** \ **Category:** General Proposal\ **Created:** [February 3, 2022, 10:42pm UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/introducing-vebal-tokenomics/2512 "2022-02-03T22:42:23Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 20
**Author:** ![merkleplant](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.balancer.fi/merkleplant/32/975_2.png) [@merkleplant](https://forum.balancer.fi/u/merkleplant)\ **Post date:** [February 7, 2022, 2:37pm UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/introducing-vebal-tokenomics/2512/20 "2022-02-07T14:37:42Z")
Hey @Fernando! Many thanks for the clarification 😇 While supporting to revamp the governance system as well as defining a fixed BAL inflation, sadly, I can not support a governance system that is less accessible for some parts of the community than for others. One follow-up question from my side (where I may have missed the reasoning): Whats the rational of revamping the governance system “right now”? Could there be a way of pushing the effort a bit more further and waiting for protocols building gov systems which include L2s? Anyway, all other parts of the proposal look promising and I’m sure you put a lot of thought into the trade-offs. Keep up the great work! 💯 --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/introducing-vebal-tokenomics/2512)._