# \[BIP-XXX\] General guidelines on second voting

**URL:** <https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-xxx-general-guidelines-on-second-voting/4039>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [November 22, 2022, 12:02pm UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-xxx-general-guidelines-on-second-voting/4039 "2022-11-22T12:02:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 23

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zekraken](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.balancer.fi/zekraken/32/823_2.png) [@zekraken](https://forum.balancer.fi/u/zekraken)\
**Post date:** [November 26, 2022, 3:03am UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-xxx-general-guidelines-on-second-voting/4039/23 "2022-11-26T03:03:39Z")

</div>

until I see more disputes against the current system coming from a number of established community members (i.e. not a bunch of first time posters) I would tend to agree to move on. that is my opinion, but at the same time people are free to do what they want under the current system.

I also feel that this barrage of proposals against the current system (rather than one well defined proposal with a comprehensive plan to reshape governance) could turn prospective/current users away from Balancer, but maybe that is the goal.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-xxx-general-guidelines-on-second-voting/4039)._