I support this proposal a lot less now, as it is being used as a reason why other projects/ideas should not be allowed to innovate and grow on Balancer/veBAL.
I fully support the idea, and I fully support trying many things with a new ecosystem/tokenomic structure.
The comments in the linked gauge governance however seems to present this as an overarching solution that excludes others. Therefore, I am opposed.
I would like to see this reframed in a way that is more data driven, and takes into account that other entities may also be trying to develop on top of veBAL. This governance should make that more possible not less.