# \[BIP-435\] Change to Yes based Quorum of 1 Million Yes votes

**URL:** <https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-435-change-to-yes-based-quorum-of-1-million-yes-votes/4798>\
**Category:** General Proposal\
**Created:** [May 19, 2023, 3:42pm UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-435-change-to-yes-based-quorum-of-1-million-yes-votes/4798 "2023-05-19T15:42:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tritium](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.balancer.fi/tritium/32/2011_2.png) [@Tritium](https://forum.balancer.fi/u/Tritium)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2023, 5:09pm UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-435-change-to-yes-based-quorum-of-1-million-yes-votes/4798/4 "2023-05-19T17:09:21Z")

</div>

Let’s say that I am a vlAURA voter, and I want to not vote for something. If I don’t vote on the Aura snapshot, then my votes are just lumped in with everyone else.

If I explicitly wish to note vote for for a matter, I can indicate that by choosing abstain. Then those votes will not be counted towards Quorum.

Make sense?

Are you looking to add 4 options? I don’t think this needs to be so complicated, but if there are voters who also wish to abstain and help Quorum, but not vote in a direction we can deal with it. The foundation members said it was fine and they can just stay out of the things they shouldn’t take a position on.

The 3 current options are dictated by [[BIP-163] Restructure Governance Process - Disband Governance Council](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-163-restructure-governance-process-disband-governance-council/4244)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-435-change-to-yes-based-quorum-of-1-million-yes-votes/4798)._
