# \[BIP-298\] Enable tBTC/ETH \[Arbitrum\] **URL:** \ **Category:** BAL Gauges\ **Created:** [May 17, 2023, 1:48pm UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-298-enable-tbtc-eth-arbitrum/4789 "2023-05-17T13:48:40Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 3
**Author:** ![solarcurve](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.balancer.fi/solarcurve/32/1487_2.png) [@solarcurve](https://forum.balancer.fi/u/solarcurve)\ **Post date:** [May 18, 2023, 12:44am UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-298-enable-tbtc-eth-arbitrum/4789/3 "2023-05-18T00:44:03Z")
I’d advise reviewing the [gauge framework](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-57-introduce-gauge-framework-v1/3604) proposal to understand when the 2% cap comes into play. In this case tBTC is freely mintable with BTC so there’s no reason a cap is required. In terms of giving ppl more time to discuss, please don’t let the fact that this is queued for a vote stop you from initiating a discussion. You can review the latest [governance process](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-163-restructure-governance-process-disband-governance-council/4244) but the tldr is there’s no requirement for any discussion phase before a BIP can go to a vote. Most of the time gauge proposals have zero discussion regardless of whether they sit here a day or 7 or longer. You can browse through previous BIP’s to get an idea of how many have any discussion at all (a small minority). --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-298-enable-tbtc-eth-arbitrum/4789)._