# \[BIP-115\] Balancer Smart Vaults Fee Collector

**URL:** <https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-115-balancer-smart-vaults-fee-collector/3966>\
**Category:** General Proposal\
**Created:** [November 9, 2022, 3:09pm UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-115-balancer-smart-vaults-fee-collector/3966 "2022-11-09T15:09:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![solarcurve](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.balancer.fi/solarcurve/32/1487_2.png) [@solarcurve](https://forum.balancer.fi/u/solarcurve)\
**Post date:** [November 9, 2022, 4:48pm UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-115-balancer-smart-vaults-fee-collector/3966/3 "2022-11-09T16:48:38Z")

</div>

yes, we will need to finalize the `ProtocolFeeSplitter` and if indeed that will sit on top, the smart vaults will need to withdraw through that rather than the `ProtocolFeesWithdrawer`.

Thanks for bringing this up, has been on my mind as well. We should have an answer on this fairly soon.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-115-balancer-smart-vaults-fee-collector/3966)._
