# BAL Whitelist - Round 4

**URL:** <https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bal-whitelist-round-4/112>\
**Category:** Liquidity Mining \[deprecated\]\
**Created:** [July 18, 2020, 9:53pm UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bal-whitelist-round-4/112 "2020-07-18T21:53:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rabmarut](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.balancer.fi/rabmarut/32/55_2.png) [@rabmarut](https://forum.balancer.fi/u/rabmarut)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2020, 9:53pm UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bal-whitelist-round-4/112/1 "2020-07-18T21:53:05Z")

</div>

On behalf of the Balancer community, I’d like to propose the following modifications to the token whitelist used for BAL governance distribution. For reference, please see the previous proposals which detail the motivation for creation of the whitelist and define the list of tokens used to date:

[https://forum.balancer.fi/t/proposing-the-token-whitelist-for-bal-distribution](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/proposing-the-token-whitelist-for-bal-distribution)  
[https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bal-whitelist-round-2](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bal-whitelist-round-2)  
[https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bal-whitelist-round-3](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bal-whitelist-round-3)

1. Out of an abundance of caution, I propose to temporarily remove AMPL from the whitelist. While there are no immediate concerns, the supply rebasing mechanism does present some interesting complexities with respect to Balancer’s internal balance tracking and gulp() arbitrage opportunities. In light of the deflationary token attack, the Balancer team will collaborate with the Ampleforth team on an audit. This audit will explore the possibly unforeseen consequences of AMPL’s daily supply rebase as it concerns Balancer pools. After completion of the audit, so long as no vulnerabilities are found, AMPL will be reinstated to the token whitelist.

2. DFOhub’s BUIDL token has undergone a contract swap. The second item on this proposal is the migration of this token’s whitelist entry from the old contract to the new one:

3. Finally, I propose adding the following tokens to the existing whitelist:

The proposed changes would go into effect at 00:00 UTC on Monday, July 20.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![boxmining](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.balancer.fi/boxmining/32/111_2.png) [@boxmining](https://forum.balancer.fi/u/boxmining)\
**Post date:** [July 23, 2020, 3:06am UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bal-whitelist-round-4/112/2 "2020-07-23T03:06:13Z")

</div>

Hey!  
Wondering if this has been passed. Trying to find the whitelist of all BAL tokens - I saw this once but don’t seem to be able to find it now

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rabmarut](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.balancer.fi/rabmarut/32/55_2.png) [@rabmarut](https://forum.balancer.fi/u/rabmarut)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2020, 4:26pm UTC](https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bal-whitelist-round-4/112/3 "2020-07-25T16:26:28Z")

</div>

This has passed. These whitelist proposals are typically non-contentious, so they automatically pass after 24 hours unless there is some dissent. The active whitelist can be found here: [https://github.com/balancer-labs/pool-management/blob/develop/src/deployed.json](https://github.com/balancer-labs/pool-management/blob/develop/src/deployed.json)